[ad_1]
AMD’s flagship RDNA 2 graphics card, the RX 6900 XT, continues to drop in worth over within the US. Proper now you possibly can choose this once-fastest-ever Radeon GPU for simply $500 if you purchase an open field mannequin from Newegg. That is excellent, on condition that this card value twice as a lot when it debuted in 2020.
That is the flowery AsRock Phantom Gaming D mannequin too, which brings a snazzy design and a quicker 2340MHz enhance clock (versus 2250MHz on the vanilla spec).
So is the RX 6900 XT nonetheless value contemplating in 2024? It is clearly been some time because the card’s heyday, nevertheless it’s nonetheless fairly a strong choice for anybody that values rasterised efficiency over RT efficiency, with a hefty chunk of VRAM – 16GB – as a bonus. That latter level makes it a sensible choice for a video manufacturing machine, or different use circumstances that use lots of VRAM like 3D modelling or scientific computing.
By way of lacking options, AMD’s new FSR 3 body era tech works superb on “last-gen” RX 6000 graphics playing cards just like the RX 6900 XT – versus DLSS 3 which is barely out there for the newest collection of Nvidia GPUs. Equally, AMD’s Fluid Movement Frames, a form of extra restricted however virtually common body era tech that does not require developer enter, was initially introduced as being an RX 7000 unique however now works on RX 6000 playing cards too. The one factor you are actually lacking out on is Anti-Lag+, a latency-reducing function that’s in-built by builders versus vanilla Anti-Lag that which works extra universally with out developer enter.
The massive query right here is whether or not the RX 6900 XT is healthier than the RX 7800 XT, which is in the same worth and efficiency class – you will get a really fundamental reference mannequin for round $510 at Newegg, for example, which should carry out inside 5 p.c or so of the RX 6900 XT. I would be tempted to go for the newer 7800 XT, as it’s kind of extra power-efficient, however each playing cards are viable choices I would say, with each being able to efficiency benefits relying on the sport chosen.
[ad_2]